Papers in Sociology

Philosophy - Confusion - Balance

Written by Muhannad Sunbul

Leaves are different from roots. Leaves give the sense that the speech is springy, green, scattered, branching out from twigs, sprinkled with fruits or flowers, while roots or bases give a more profound and authentic impression, of the old guard, of the search for the source of water, of history and foundation. As for what is under the title, that is, the three words: "Philosophy, Disturbances, Balance", they indicate a departure from the subject, especially the word philosophy. The book is therefore a general philosophical book, but it is a calm and simplified philosophy, far from jargon. For those who have not read about sociology, the book is considered an introduction to the science and a stimulus to expand it, as it will add a kind of sociological sense. However, if you are familiar with sociology, I expect that you will find great philosophical depth in the book

The first chapter of the book is about philosophy and includes several chapters: one chapter explains the concept of goodness and its origin. Another chapter discusses the illusion of individualism. The third chapter discusses the family as the building block of society and realism. The fourth chapter discusses the surrounding environment and its influence. The fifth chapter discusses metaphysics and the impact of philosophy on societies, all in an easy, non-school-based style. The second chapter discusses the most prominent distractions or obstacles that harm society, each distraction in a chapter. These are as follows: racism, procrastination, revenge and pornography, delving into the subconscious, mixing politics and religion, the king's dilemma, capitalism and hegemony (Google for example), and the philosophy of evil. The third chapter, titled "Balance," discusses the marginalized, such as the insane and addicts, and the necessity of containing them. It also discusses the intellectual impact of quantum physics on the social sciences and the principle of uncertainty. It also discusses the illusion of control and its replacement with environmental balance.

I would like to point out that the book contains many quotes and quotations from the previous book by the same author: “The Forty Rules of Madness.” If you have read it, then perhaps there is no need to read this book unless you liked the previous book so much that you intend to read it again, or if you have a strong passion for sociology.